On paper, “splitting everything 50/50” sounds fair. Equal shares, equal rights, clean break. But here’s the ugly truth: a 50/50 split often leaves stay-at-home parents at a massive disadvantage.

Why? Because money in divorce isn’t just about the snapshot of today’s bank balance. It’s about how those numbers got there, and where they’re headed.
Within the last few years, a Spanish court awarded €204,624.86 (approx. $215,664 USD) plus a €500/month annuity to a homemaker for 25 years of exclusive domestic labor, breaking new legal ground in recognizing that such unpaid labor entitles financial compensation, even under a separation-of-property marriage regime.
This discussion should be required reading for any spouse or parent thinking of “staying home” or stepping back from their career during a marriage. Here in New York, there is very little return-on-investment for that sacrifice, and a court isn’t going to compensate for the lost time and future career setbacks.
Spanish Case for Homemakers
Spain just did what most U.S. courts still refuse to do: put a price tag on stay-at-home labor.
In 2023, a judge in Vélez-Málaga told a husband to cough up more than €204,000 (about $215,000) to his ex-wife, Ivana Moral, for the 25 years she spent running their household instead of climbing a career ladder. That number wasn’t pulled out of thin air, it was based on Spain’s minimum professional wage, multiplied across the decades she was “on the clock” as an unpaid homemaker.
On top of that, the court awarded her a €500 monthly pension, recognizing that she can’t just walk back into the workforce and magically earn like her ex does. And here’s the kicker: the couple had a separation of property agreement, meaning technically his assets were his and hers were hers.
The court blew past that excuse, calling out the economic abuse baked into a system that lets one spouse leave with career momentum while the other leaves with a resume gap. Translation: her years of invisible labor weren’t charity, they were the foundation of his success.
The Invisible Career Boost
For years, a stay-at-home parent (typically, a mom) is the one who makes her partner’s career possible. She’s running the household, raising the kids, and managing the dozens of “invisible” tasks that free him up to focus on work. Those late nights at the office, the last-minute trip to impress a client, the Saturday golf game with the boss, all of that is possible because someone else is home keeping the family running smoothly.
That unpaid labor doesn’t show up on a pay stub, but it is the foundation of promotions, raises, and reputation. Without such contributions, the financial earner is not the “rockstar employee” who gets tapped for advancement. In divorce, however, the courts often undervalue or ignore this reality. This is because he gets credit for the income and the career trajectory, while she gets told to be satisfied with “half.”
Static Numbers vs. Dynamic Reality
Divorce courts and settlements like clean math: divide the accounts, value the house, split the retirement funds. But finances aren’t static snapshots, they’re living, moving, and compounding.
When one spouse has been out of the workforce for years, their earning potential is frozen while the other’s continues to grow. He may be making $200,000 now, but in ten years that could be $400,000. Meanwhile, she may struggle to re-enter the workforce at $40,000 or less, often in jobs beneath her education level because of the resume gap.
That means ten years down the line, “half” of today’s money doesn’t mean anything close to equality. One spouse’s assets and income are snowballing, while the other’s are barely keeping pace with inflation. Without protections like maintenance or creative settlements, the stay-at-home parent ends up left behind.
Equality Isn’t Just Arithmetic
“Equal” doesn’t always mean “fair.” Cutting everything down the middle ignores context, history, and sacrifice. True fairness takes into account that one spouse built their career on the shoulders of the other’s unpaid work.

Think about it: if one spouse invested a decade into the other’s education or business, no one would blink at compensating them for that contribution. But when the investment is diapers, homework help, packed lunches, and keeping a household running, suddenly it’s dismissed as “just parenting.”
That attitude isn’t just sexist; it’s financially devastating. Courts and lawyers have to stop treating homemaking as a side hobby and start recognizing it as the economic engine running highly successful earners.
What Equity Looks Like
A fair divorce settlement accounts for both past contributions and future realities. That can include:
- Spousal support or maintenance: Not charity, but compensation for economic sacrifices that made the other spouse’s career possible.
- Asset distribution with foresight: Awarding retirement funds, real estate, or other appreciating assets to balance out lost earning potential.
- Career rebuilding support: Funding for education, training, or certifications so the stay-at-home parent can actually re-enter the workforce.
- Long-term planning: Recognizing that a one-time payout may not be enough, and ensuring stability with ongoing financial protections.
When these factors are built into a settlement, the result is closer to a fair settlement that reflects the work actually done by both parties.
Bottom Line
A straight 50/50 split may look equal, but in reality, it can devastate the spouse who traded career growth for family growth. If you’re a stay-at-home parent, don’t settle for “half.” Demand a divorce agreement that reflects your sacrifices and sets you up for a secure future.

And, if you’re considering stepping out of the workforce to take on a full-time homemaking role, think carefully about the financial trade-offs. Divorce may not be in your plans, but with nearly half of marriages ending that way, it would be reckless not to factor those odds into your decision.
Equity in divorce isn’t just about splitting what’s in the bank today, it’s about protecting the life you helped build for tomorrow.